b. 1-12
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The sources differ here with regard to the placement and scope of hairpins in bars 1-2, 3-4, 9-10 and 11-12. The differences in the scope only relate to the starting points; in bar 1 of GC and bars 1, 3 and 9 of FE the hairpins begin on the 2nd note. We consider it to be an inaccuracy of notation. In FE and GE the hairpins are placed horizontally between the staves. GC has a similar arrangement, although the signs in bars 9-12 are written onto the lower staff, which cannot be reproduced in print For our main text we adopt the graphic layout of EE, wich may correspond to the notation of the autograph. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 1-12
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Slurs below the staff in bars 1-4 and 9-12 were added in GE, doubtless by a reviser; the same goes for bars 12-14 and many other places. Such doubling of performance indications is very rarely found in authentic sources. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
We propose leaving the title without the ordinal number. As can be seen in GC, that number was added later. It is highly likely that numbers sometimes appearing in titles were added, even by Chopin himself, for marketing purposes. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Both versions of the dedication are probably authentic; the version of FE may be a later one. The question why the dedication was missing from EE is difficult to answer, category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Dedications |
||||||||
b. 2-12
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
EE is the only source to have staccato dots in bars 2, 4, 10 and 12. There are no reasons to doubt their authenticity. category imprint: Differences between sources |